Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (With Picard’s Little Theorem)

This post assumes familiarity with some basic concepts in complex analysis, including continuity and entire (everywhere complex-differentiable) functions. This is likely the simplest proof of the theorem (at least, among those that this author has seen), although it stands on the shoulders of a highly nontrivial theorem.

The fundamental theorem of algebra has quite a few number of proofs (enough to fill a book!). In fact, it seems a new tool in mathematics can prove its worth by being able to prove the fundamental theorem in a different way. This series of proofs of the fundamental theorem also highlights how in mathematics there are many many ways to prove a single theorem, and in re-proving an established theorem we introduce new concepts and strategies. And perhaps most of all, we accentuate the unifying beauty of mathematics.

Problem: Let p(z): \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C} be a non-constant polynomial. Prove p(z) has a root in \mathbb{C}.

Solution: Picard’s Little Theorem states that any entire function \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C} whose range omits two distinct points must be constant. (See here for a proof sketch, and other notes)

Suppose to the contrary that p has no zero. We claim p also does not achieve some number in the set \left \{ \frac{1}{k} : k \in \mathbb{N} \right \}. Indeed, if it achieved all such values, we claim continuity would provide a zero. First, observe that as p(z) is unbounded for large enough |z|, we may pick a c \in \mathbb{R} such that |p(z)| > 1 whenever |z| > c. Then the points z_k such that p(z) = 1/k all lie within the closed disk of radius c. Because the set is closed and the complex plane is a complete metric space, we see that the sequence of z_k converges to some z, and by continuity p(z) = 0.

In other words, no such sequence of z_k can exist, and hence there is some 1/k omitted in the range of p(z). As polynomials are entire, Picard’s Little theorem applies, and we conclude that p(z) is constant, a contradiction. \square

One thought on “Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (With Picard’s Little Theorem)

  1. “we see that the sequence of z_k converges to some z”. Isn’t it that z_k isn’t necessarily convergent but that it has a convergent subsequence by the Bolzanno Weirstrass theorem? Also, since we know no such sequence z_k can exist then there are only finitely many z_k and thus there are plenty of points omitted from the set of interest.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s